Oberti Sullivan LLP
(713) 401-3555www.osattorneys.com
ed@osattorneys.com
mark@osattorneys.comArchives
Categories
- ADA
- At Will Employment
- Damages
- Disability
- Discovery
- Discrimination
- Dodd Frank
- EEOC
- Fiduciary Duty
- FLSA
- FMLA
- Harassment
- Houston Employment Law
- Houston Executive Lawyer
- Houston Retaliation Law
- Human Resources
- Inevitable Disclosure
- NLRA
- Non Compete Agreements
- Overtime
- Retaliation
- Separation Agreements
- SOX
- Statute of Limitations
- Trade Secrets
- Uncategorized
- Wages
- Whistleblower
-
Recent Posts
- Five Provisions All Executives Should Have In Their Employment Agreements
- Fifth Circuit Reminds Plaintiffs That Not Every Unpleasant Experience At Work Is Something They Can Sue Over Under Title VII’s Anti-Discrimination Provision
- Fifth Circuit Holds That A Supervisor’s Gender Related Comments Are Not “Direct Evidence” Of Gender Discrimination In Pay
- Fifth Circuit Finds Employee’s FMLA Retaliation Claim Doomed By Proof That Employer Fired The Employee Based On A Good Faith Belief She Had Been Dishonest About Being Unable To Work Due To Illness
- New Fifth Circuit Disability Harassment Case Again Emphasizes The Importance Of Complying With An Employer’s Complaint Policies And Procedures
Blogs I Follow
Blog Stats
- 41,654 hits
Category Archives: Houston Executive Lawyer
Five Provisions All Executives Should Have In Their Employment Agreements
It is often assumed that executives have more job security than most employees. But, executives know that is not necessarily so. Executives lose their jobs because of mergers, acquisitions, shifting political winds in the C-Suite, falling share prices, and a … Continue reading
Fifth Circuit Reminds Plaintiffs That Not Every Unpleasant Experience At Work Is Something They Can Sue Over Under Title VII’s Anti-Discrimination Provision
In Stroy v. Gibson, 896 F.3d 693 (5th Cir. 2018), opinion here, the plaintiff, Stroy, was an African-American doctor for the VA. Dr. Stroy believed that the VA implemented a peer review of his patient care decisions because of his … Continue reading
Fifth Circuit Holds That A Supervisor’s Gender Related Comments Are Not “Direct Evidence” Of Gender Discrimination In Pay
In Herster v. Board of Supervisors of Louisiana State Univ., 887 F.3d 177 (5th Cir. 2018), opinion here, the plaintiff, Herster was a female part-time instructor at LSU. LSU had hired her husband at its law school, and then found … Continue reading
Fifth Circuit Finds Employee’s FMLA Retaliation Claim Doomed By Proof That Employer Fired The Employee Based On A Good Faith Belief She Had Been Dishonest About Being Unable To Work Due To Illness
In DeVoss v. Southwest Airlines Co., 903 F.3d 487 (5th Cir. 2018), attached here, DeVoss, an airline flight attendant called in late to work and invoked a commuter policy to justify her tardiness. After she was told that the commuter … Continue reading
Five Questions That Individual Employees Should Ask Before Hiring A Houston Employment Lawyer
Hopefully you will never need an employment lawyer in Houston. Luckily, there are many great Houston employment lawyers, and they work at firms all over the city. Some of them rank highly on Google search results, and others do not. … Continue reading
Texas Supreme Court Hands Victory To Employers In The Evolving Law Regarding Non-Competition Agreements
Mark Oberti observes: On Friday, August 29, 2014, the Texas Supreme Court delivered another victory for employers seeking to enforce post-employment restrictions against former employees who seek to go to work for competitors. In Exxon Mobil Corp. v. Drennan, No. … Continue reading
Post-Rimkus Duty of Preservation and Spoliation of Evidence Decisions (Part VIII)
We are blogging on “Non-competes, Trade Secrets, Fiduciary Duties, and the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine.” Mark Oberti has prepared a detailed paper on all of these issues, which can be found here. The following post discusses how other courts view Rimkus … Continue reading
Post-Rimkus Duty of Preservation and Spoliation of Evidence Decisions (Part VI)
We are blogging on “Non-competes, Trade Secrets, Fiduciary Duties, and the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine.” Mark Oberti has prepared a detailed paper on all of these issues, which can be found here. The following post discusses how other courts view Rimkus … Continue reading
Post-Rimkus Duty of Preservation and Spoliation of Evidence Decisions (Part V)
We are blogging on “Non-competes, Trade Secrets, Fiduciary Duties, and the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine.” Mark Oberti has prepared a detailed paper on all of these issues, which can be found here. The following post discusses how other courts view Rimkus … Continue reading
Post-Rimkus Duty of Preservation and Spoliation of Evidence Decisions (Part IV)
We are blogging on “Non-competes, Trade Secrets, Fiduciary Duties, and the Inevitable Disclosure Doctrine.” Mark Oberti has prepared a detailed paper on all of these issues, which can be found here. The following post discusses how other courts view Rimkus … Continue reading
